Einstein@Home all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O2 public data
B. Steltner, M. A. Papa, H.-B. Eggenstein, B. Allen, V. Dergachev, R., Prix, B. Machenschalk, S. Walsh, S. J. Zhu, S. Kwang

TL;DR
This paper reports the most sensitive all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O2 data, finding no signals but setting new upper limits on neutron star deformations and constraining their properties within 100 parsecs.
Contribution
It presents the first all-sky search using Einstein@Home for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO O2 data, achieving the best sensitivity up to 500 Hz and setting new upper limits.
Findings
No evidence of continuous gravitational waves was found.
The most stringent upper limit on h0 is 1.3e-25 at 163 Hz.
Constraints exclude neutron stars with certain deformations within 100 parsecs.
Abstract
We conduct an all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves in the LIGO O2 data from the Hanford and Livingston detectors. We search for nearly-monochromatic signals with frequency between 20.0 Hz and 585.15 Hz and spin-down between -2.6e-9 Hz/s and 2.6e-10 Hz/s. We deploy the search on the Einstein@Home volunteer-computing project and follow-up the waveforms associated with the most significant results with eight further search-stages, reaching the best sensitivity ever achieved by an all-sky survey up to 500 Hz. Six of the inspected waveforms pass all the stages but they are all associated with hardware-injections, which are fake signals simulated at the LIGO detector for validation purposes. We recover all these fake signals with consistent parameters. No other waveform survives, so we find no evidence of a continuous gravitational wave signal at the detectability level of our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
