An essential, hyperconnected, local geometric morphism that is not locally connected
Jens Hemelaer, Morgan Rogers

TL;DR
This paper presents a specific example of a geometric morphism that is essential, hyperconnected, and local but not locally connected, highlighting a nuanced distinction in the theory of geometric morphisms.
Contribution
It provides the first known example of such a morphism, derived from geometric morphisms between presheaf categories on monoids.
Findings
Constructs an explicit example of the morphism
Shows the morphism is hyperconnected but not locally connected
Advances understanding of geometric morphism properties
Abstract
We give an example of an essential, hyperconnected, local geometric morphism that is not locally connected, arising from our work-in-progress on geometric morphisms , where and are monoids.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
