Ethical conceptual replication of visualization research considering sources of methodological bias and practical significance
Ian T. Ruginski

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a conceptual replication approach in visualization research to assess practical significance and minimize methodological biases, thereby advancing visualization meta-science.
Contribution
It introduces a focus on conceptual replication in visualization to evaluate principles across contexts and reduce biases, fostering a more rigorous scientific foundation.
Findings
Highlights importance of practical significance in visualization principles
Emphasizes reducing methodological biases in research
Proposes a framework for visualization meta-science
Abstract
General design principles for visualization have been relatively well-established based on a combination of cognitive and perceptual theory and empirical evaluations over the past 20 years. To determine how these principles hold up across use contexts and end-users, I argue that we should emphasize conceptual replication focused on determining practical significance and reducing methodological biases. This shift in thinking aims to determine how design principles interact with methodological approaches, laying the groundwork for visualization meta-science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Visualization and Analytics · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Health Policy Implementation Science
