Insights on Evaluation of Camera Re-localization Using Relative Pose Regression
Amir Shalev (1,2), Omer Achrack (2), Brian Fulkerson, and Ben-Zion, Bobrovsky (1) ((1) Tel-Aviv-University, (2) Intel)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the evaluation of camera re-localization methods based on relative pose regression, revealing a tradeoff between accuracy and subspace volume, and proposes new metrics and a baseline network to improve assessment robustness.
Contribution
It introduces three new evaluation metrics that account for regression subspace volume and presents a new baseline network for relative pose regression.
Findings
Proposed metrics are more robust to overlap threshold variations.
The new network baseline performs well across multiple datasets.
Training on a single scene generalizes effectively to others.
Abstract
We consider the problem of relative pose regression in visual relocalization. Recently, several promising approaches have emerged in this area. We claim that even though they demonstrate on the same datasets using the same split to train and test, a faithful comparison between them was not available since on currently used evaluation metric, some approaches might perform favorably, while in reality performing worse. We reveal a tradeoff between accuracy and the 3D volume of the regressed subspace. We believe that unlike other relocalization approaches, in the case of relative pose regression, the regressed subspace 3D volume is less dependent on the scene and more affect by the method used to score the overlap, which determined how closely sampled viewpoints are. We propose three new metrics to remedy the issue mentioned above. The proposed metrics incorporate statistics about the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
