TL;DR
This paper investigates the electroweak phase transition in the NMSSM, showing that nucleation probability analysis provides a more accurate picture of phase transition patterns than just examining critical temperatures, impacting baryogenesis viability.
Contribution
It demonstrates that nucleation probability calculations can differ from critical temperature analyses in identifying viable parameter space for electroweak baryogenesis in the NMSSM.
Findings
Nucleation analysis favors different parameter regions than critical temperature analysis.
Critical temperature analysis can be misleading for phase transition pattern assessment.
Nucleation probability is crucial for understanding the electroweak phase transition in the NMSSM.
Abstract
Electroweak baryogenesis is an attractive mechanism to generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe via a strong first order electroweak phase transition. We compare the phase transition patterns suggested by the vacuum structure at the critical temperatures, at which local minima are degenerate, with those obtained from computing the probability for nucleation via tunneling through the barrier separating local minima. Heuristically, nucleation becomes difficult if the barrier between the local minima is too high, or if the distance (in field space) between the minima is too large. As an example of a model exhibiting such behavior, we study the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, whose scalar sector contains two SU(2) doublets and one gauge singlet. We find that the calculation of the nucleation probabilities prefers different regions of parameter space for a strong first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
