Outgassing rate comparison of seven geometrically similar vacuum chambers of different materials and heat treatments
James A. Fedchak (1), Julia K. Scherschligt (1), Sefer Avdiaj (2),, Daniel S. Barker (1), Stephen P. Eckel (1), Ben Bowers (3), Scott OConnell, (3), Perry Henderson (3) ((1) National Institute of Standards, Technology, (NIST), Gaithersburg, (2) University of Prishtina, Kosova

TL;DR
This study compares water and hydrogen outgassing rates of seven geometrically identical vacuum chambers made from different materials and heat treatments, identifying optimal materials for ultra-high vacuum applications.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of outgassing rates across multiple materials and heat treatments, including vacuum-fire processing, for the first time in a controlled, identical-geometry setting.
Findings
316L, 316LN, and vacuum-fire treated chambers have significantly lower outgassing rates.
Titanium and aluminum chambers exhibit outgassing rates comparable to or better than stainless steel.
Vacuum-fire treatment effectively reduces outgassing rates in stainless steel chambers.
Abstract
We have measured the water and hydrogen outgassing rates of seven vacuum chambers of identical geometry but constructed of different materials and heat treatments. Chambers of five different materials were tested: 304L, 316L, and 316LN stainless steels; titanium (ASTM grade 2); and 6061 aluminum. In addition, chambers constructed of 316L and 316LN stainless steel were subjected to a vacuum-fire process, where they were heated to approximately 950 {\deg}C for 24 hours while under vacuum; these two chambers are designated as 316L-XHV and 316LN-XHV. All chambers were of identical geometry and made by the same manufacturer, thus a relative comparison of the outgassing rates among these chambers can be made. Water outgassing rates were measured as a function of time using the throughput technique. The water outgassing results for the 316L, 316LN, 316L-XHV, 316LN-XHV were all similar, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
