Is Q-Learning Provably Efficient? An Extended Analysis
Kushagra Rastogi, Jonathan Lee, Fabrice Harel-Canada, Aditya, Joglekar

TL;DR
This paper extends the theoretical analysis of Q-learning with UCB exploration, demonstrating it achieves sample efficiency comparable to optimal model-based methods, and provides a survey of related research.
Contribution
It offers a detailed proof analysis showing Q-learning's provable efficiency and contextualizes it within existing research on reinforcement learning guarantees.
Findings
Q-learning with UCB exploration matches optimal regret bounds.
Provides a comprehensive survey of related reinforcement learning research.
Highlights critical proof steps for Q-learning's efficiency.
Abstract
This work extends the analysis of the theoretical results presented within the paper Is Q-Learning Provably Efficient? by Jin et al. We include a survey of related research to contextualize the need for strengthening the theoretical guarantees related to perhaps the most important threads of model-free reinforcement learning. We also expound upon the reasoning used in the proofs to highlight the critical steps leading to the main result showing that Q-learning with UCB exploration achieves a sample efficiency that matches the optimal regret that can be achieved by any model-based approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Data Stream Mining Techniques
MethodsQ-Learning
