Logical foundations for hybrid type-logical grammars
Richard Moot (TEXTE, LIRMM, CNRS), Symon Stevens-Guille

TL;DR
This paper establishes proof-theoretic foundations for hybrid type-logical grammars, combining Lambek and lambda grammars, by proving normalization, subformula property, and developing sequent and proof net calculi.
Contribution
It introduces the first proof-theoretic analysis of hybrid type-logical grammars, enabling future variants and extensions such as non-associative and multimodal systems.
Findings
Proved normalization and subformula property for the calculus
Developed sequent and proof net calculi for hybrid grammars
Facilitated future extensions including non-associative and multimodal versions
Abstract
This paper explores proof-theoretic aspects of hybrid type-logical grammars , a logic combining Lambek grammars with lambda grammars. We prove some basic properties of the calculus, such as normalisation and the subformula property and also present both a sequent and a proof net calculus for hybrid type-logical grammars. In addition to clarifying the logical foundations of hybrid type-logical grammars, the current study opens the way to variants and extensions of the original system, including but not limited to a non-associative version and a multimodal version incorporating structural rules and unary modes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
