Comment on "A sensitivity study of the primary correlators used to characterize chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation'' by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey
Yicheng Feng, Fuqiang Wang, Jie Zhao

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous publication by Magdy et al., highlighting an apparent error in their analysis of charge separation in chiral magnetism, emphasizing the importance of accuracy in high-energy physics research.
Contribution
It provides a critical comment identifying a potential error in a prior study on chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation.
Findings
Identifies an apparent error in the previous publication.
Highlights the need for careful analysis in charge separation studies.
Calls for review or correction of the original results.
Abstract
This note points out an apparent error in the publication Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 809} (2020) 135771 by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
