TL;DR
This paper introduces a counterfactual inference approach within a causal graph framework to mitigate clickbait effects in recommendation systems, thereby improving user satisfaction beyond traditional CTR optimization.
Contribution
It proposes a novel counterfactual recommendation method that reduces clickbait bias by modeling causal relationships and estimating click likelihood in a counterfactual scenario.
Findings
Significantly improves user satisfaction in real-world datasets
Reduces the impact of clickbait on recommendation quality
Enhances the robustness of CTR models against misleading clicks
Abstract
Recommendation is a prevalent and critical service in information systems. To provide personalized suggestions to users, industry players embrace machine learning, more specifically, building predictive models based on the click behavior data. This is known as the Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction, which has become the gold standard for building personalized recommendation service. However, we argue that there is a significant gap between clicks and user satisfaction -- it is common that a user is "cheated" to click an item by the attractive title/cover of the item. This will severely hurt user's trust on the system if the user finds the actual content of the clicked item disappointing. What's even worse, optimizing CTR models on such flawed data will result in the Matthew Effect, making the seemingly attractive but actually low-quality items be more frequently recommended. In this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
