A social license for nuclear technologies
Seth A. Hoedl

TL;DR
This paper explores how nuclear technologies can gain societal acceptance through a social license, emphasizing public engagement, trust, and safety to facilitate deployment of nuclear waste repositories and advanced reactors.
Contribution
It modernizes the concept of social license in nuclear technology, providing concrete recommendations for public engagement and acceptance strategies.
Findings
Successful nuclear waste repositories are linked to social license factors.
Trust and transparency are crucial for societal acceptance.
Recommendations improve deployment prospects for new nuclear facilities.
Abstract
Nuclear energy technologies have the potential to help mitigate climate change. However, these technologies face many challenges, including high costs, societal concern and opposition, and health, safety, environmental and proliferation risks. Many companies and academic research groups are pursuing advanced designs, both fission and fusion-based, to address both costs and these risks. This Chapter complements these efforts by analyzing how nuclear technologies can address societal concerns through the acquisition of a social license, a nebulous concept that represents "society's consent" and that has been used to facilitate and improve a wide range of publicly and privately funded projects and activities subject to a range of regulatory oversight, including large industrial facilities, controversial genetic engineering research, and environmental management. Suggestions for public…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
