Software Engineering Standards for Epidemiological Modeling
Jack K. Horner, John F. Symons

TL;DR
This paper advocates applying safety-critical software engineering standards to epidemiological models, using a case study of the Imperial College COVID-19 simulator to improve quality and reliability.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for evaluating epidemiological software quality based on established safety-critical standards, with practical guidance for stakeholders.
Findings
The ICL COVID-19 simulator can be assessed using safety-critical standards.
Applying engineering standards improves reliability of epidemiological models.
Provides a case study demonstrating the benefits of standards adoption.
Abstract
There are many normative and technical questions involved in evaluating the quality of software used in epidemiological simulations. In this paper we answer some of these questions and offer practical guidance to practitioners, funders, scientific journals, and consumers of epidemiological research. The heart of our paper is a case study of the Imperial College London (ICL) COVID-19 simulator. We contend that epidemiological simulators should be engineered and evaluated within the framework of safety-critical standards developed by the consensus of the software engineering community for applications such as automotive and aircraft control.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
