Persisting asymmetry in the probability distribution function for a random advection-diffusion equation in impermeable channels
R. Camassa, L. Ding, Z. Kilic, and R. M. McLaughlin

TL;DR
This paper rigorously analyzes how impermeable boundaries influence the skewness of the long-term probability distribution of a passive scalar in random shear flows, revealing boundary-induced asymmetry and its dependence on flow parameters.
Contribution
The study provides a rigorous theoretical framework for understanding boundary effects on scalar distribution skewness, extending previous numerical findings and deriving exact correlator formulas for specific flow conditions.
Findings
Boundaries cause the scalar PDF to be negatively skewed at low Péclet numbers.
The long-term moments depend explicitly on the shear parameter b3.
The derived correlator formulas generalize previous results and match simulations.
Abstract
We study the effect of impermeable boundaries on the symmetry properties of a random passive scalar field advected by random flows. We focus on a broad class of nonlinear shear flows multiplied by a stationary, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) time varying process, including some of their limiting cases, such as Gaussian white noise or plug flows. For the former case with linear shear, recent studies \cite{camassa2019symmetry} numerically demonstrated that the decaying passive scalar's long time limiting probability distribution function (PDF) could be negatively skewed in the presence of impermeable channel boundaries, in contrast to rigorous results in free space which established the limiting PDF is positively skewed \cite{mclaughlin1996explicit}. Here, the role of boundaries in setting the long time limiting skewness of the PDF is established rigorously for the above class using the long…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
