Revisiting Consensus-Based Energy-Management in Smart Grid with Transmission Losses and Directed Communication
Jan Zimmermann, Tatiana Tatarenko, Volker Willert, J\"urgen Adamy

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a distributed energy management algorithm in smart grids, identifies logical flaws in prior theorems, and proposes corrections to ensure optimality despite transmission losses and directed communication.
Contribution
It reveals contradictions in existing theorems, demonstrates the algorithm's limitations, and offers a rectified version with valid theoretical guarantees.
Findings
Identified flaws in the original theorems of [1]
Provided a counterexample showing non-optimality
Proposed an adjusted algorithm with correct theoretical proof
Abstract
We discovered a deficiency in Algorithm 1 and Theorem 3 of [1]. The algorithm called CEMA aims to solve an energy management problem distributively. However, by means of a counter example, we show that Theorem 2 and 3 of [1] contradict each other in the case of a valid scenario, proving that the suggested algorithm does not always find the optimum. Furthermore, we provide theoretic results, showing that Theorem 3 of [1] does not hold generally. At last, we provide a rectification by adjusting the algorithm and the corresponding proof of Theorem 3.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSmart Grid Security and Resilience · Smart Grid Energy Management · Power Line Communications and Noise
