Early evolution of the solar accretion disk inferred from Cr-Ti-O isotopes in individual chondrules
Jonas M. Schneider, Christoph Burkhardt, Yves Marrocchi, Gregory A., Brennecka, Thorsten Kleine

TL;DR
This study combines oxygen, titanium, and chromium isotope data from individual chondrules to reveal fundamental isotopic differences between non-carbonaceous and carbonaceous chondrites, challenging the idea of disk-wide chondrule transport.
Contribution
First combined multi-isotope analysis of individual chondrules, demonstrating local heterogeneities and challenging previous transport models in the solar accretion disk.
Findings
NC chondrules are isotopically homogeneous and similar to their host chondrites.
CC chondrules show greater isotopic variability and do not overlap with NC chondrules in multi-isotope space.
Isotopic differences suggest local heterogeneities rather than disk-wide transport.
Abstract
Isotopic anomalies in chondrules hold important clues about the dynamics of mixing and transport processes in the solar accretion disk. These anomalies have been interpreted to indicate either disk-wide transport of chondrules or local heterogeneities of chondrule precursors. However, all previous studies relied on isotopic data for a single element (either Cr, Ti, or O), which does not allow distinguishing between source and precursor signatures as the cause of the chondrules isotope anomalies. Here we obtained the first combined O, Ti, and Cr isotope data for individual chondrules from enstatite, ordinary, and carbonaceous chondrites. We find that chondrules from non-carbonaceous (NC) chondrites have relatively homogeneous {\Delta}17O, {\epsilon}50Ti, and {\epsilon}54Cr, which are similar to the compositions of their host chondrites. By contrast, chondrules from carbonaceous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
