Getting the model right; an information criterion for spectroscopy
John K. Webb, Chung-Chi Lee, Robert F. Carswell, Dinko Milakovi\'c

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Spectral Information Criterion (SpIC), a new model selection method for spectroscopy that improves over AICc and BIC by accounting for line strength and local data impact, especially at high signal-to-noise ratios.
Contribution
The paper presents SpIC, a novel information criterion tailored for spectroscopic data, addressing limitations of existing criteria by incorporating line strength and local spectral effects.
Findings
SpIC outperforms AICc at high signal-to-noise ratios.
SpIC achieves similar results to AICc at lower noise with fewer parameters.
BIC performs poorly and should be avoided in this context.
Abstract
Robust model-fitting to spectroscopic transitions is a requirement across many fields of science. The corrected Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AICc and BIC) are most frequently used to select the optimal number of fitting parameters. In general, AICc modelling is thought to overfit (too many model parameters) and BIC underfits. For spectroscopic modelling, both AICc and BIC lack in two important respects: (a) no penalty distinction is made according to line strength such that parameters of weak lines close to the detection threshold are treated with equal importance as strong lines and (b) no account is taken of the way in which spectral lines impact on narrow data regions. In this paper we introduce a new information criterion that addresses these shortcomings, the "Spectral Information Criterion" (SpIC). Spectral simulations are used to compare performances. The main…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
