When compressive learning fails: blame the decoder or the sketch?
Vincent Schellekens, Laurent Jacques

TL;DR
This paper investigates the challenges of compressive learning, focusing on the non-convex optimization landscape and the effectiveness of heuristics like CLOMPR through numerical simulations.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of why compressive learning can fail, highlighting issues with the decoder and sketch, and evaluates heuristics in this context.
Findings
Non-convex landscape affects heuristic performance
CLOMPR's limitations are linked to optimization challenges
Numerical simulations reveal conditions for successful learning
Abstract
In compressive learning, a mixture model (a set of centroids or a Gaussian mixture) is learned from a sketch vector, that serves as a highly compressed representation of the dataset. This requires solving a non-convex optimization problem, hence in practice approximate heuristics (such as CLOMPR) are used. In this work we explore, by numerical simulations, properties of this non-convex optimization landscape and those heuristics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
