SN2019yvq Does Not Conform to SN Ia Explosion Models
M. A. Tucker, C. Ashall, B. J. Shappee, P. J. Vallely, C. S. Kochanek,, M. E. Huber, G. S. Anand, J. V. Keane, E. Y. Hsiao, T. W.-S. Holoien

TL;DR
SN 2019yvq, a peculiar Type Ia supernova, challenges existing explosion models due to its unusual early flux excess, high velocities, and nebular features, indicating the need for revised theories.
Contribution
This study provides detailed observations of SN 2019yvq, revealing properties that do not fully align with current explosion models, highlighting gaps in understanding of SN Ia diversity.
Findings
Early UV/optical flux excess constrained by photometry.
Nebular spectra show persistent CaII emission, no [OI], ruling out some merger models.
High velocities and low luminosity cannot be explained simultaneously by existing models.
Abstract
We present new photometric and spectroscopic observations of SN 2019yvq, a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) exhibiting several peculiar properties including an excess of UV/optical flux within days of explosion, a high SiII velocity, and a low peak luminosity. Photometry near the time of first light places new constraints on the rapid rise of the UV/optical flux excess. A near-infrared spectrum at days after maximum light places strict limits on the presence of H or He emission, effectively excluding the presence of a nearby non-degenerate star at the time of explosion. New optical spectra, acquired at +128 and +150 days after maximum light, confirm the presence of CaII\r{A} and persistent CaII NIR triplet emission as SN 2019yvq transitions into the nebular phase. The lack of [OI]\r{A} emission disfavors the violent merger of two C/O white dwarfs (WDs) but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
