The Archetypal Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy, Dragonfly 44, is not a Dark Milky Way
Akos Bogdan

TL;DR
This study uses X-ray observations to show that the archetypal ultra-diffuse galaxy Dragonfly 44 is unlikely to be a failed massive galaxy, instead resembling a dwarf galaxy with a low-mass dark matter halo.
Contribution
It provides the first X-ray constraints on the dark matter halo mass of Dragonfly 44, challenging the idea that some UDGs are failed massive galaxies.
Findings
Dragonfly 44 and DF X1 are undetected in X-rays.
Upper limits exclude massive dark matter halos ($>5×10^{11} M_{ m ext{odot}}$).
UDGs likely have low-mass halos ($<10^{11} M_{ m ext{odot}}$).
Abstract
Due to the peculiar properties of ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs), understanding their origin presents a major challenge. Previous X-ray studies demonstrated that the bulk of UDGs lack substantial X-ray emission, implying that they reside in low-mass dark matter halos. This result, in concert with other observational and theoretical studies, pointed out that most UDGs belong to the class of dwarf galaxies. However, a subset of UDGs is believed to host a large population of globular clusters (GCs), which is indicative of massive dark matter halos. This, in turn, hints that some UDGs may be failed galaxies. In this work, I present Chandra and XMM-Newton observations of two archetypal UDGs, Dragonfly 44 and DF X1, and I constrain their dark matter halo mass based on the X-ray emission originating from hot gaseous emission and from the population of low-mass X-ray binaries…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
