NuSTAR observation of GRO J1744-28 at low mass accretion rate

TL;DR

This study analyzes NuSTAR observations of GRO J1744-28 at low luminosity, finding no cyclotron resonance scattering feature and providing insights into its magnetic field and accretion behavior.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed spectral analysis at low luminosity, setting upper limits on the CRSF and constraining the magnetic field and propeller transition threshold.

Findings

No CRSF detected at low luminosity

Pulsations observed below propeller regime threshold

Constraints on magnetic field strength and accretion rate

Abstract

We present the spectral analysis of the LMXB GRO J1744-28 using $\sim$29 ks of NuSTAR data taken in 2017 February at a low luminosity of $3.2\times 10^{36}$ erg/s (3-50 keV). The continuum spectrum is modeled with an absorbed power-law with exponential cut-off, and an additional iron line component. We find no obvious indications for a CRSF and therefore perform a detailed cyclotron line search using statistical methods on the pulse phase-averaged as well as phase-resolved spectra. The previously detected Type II X-ray bursts are absent. Clear pulsations at a period of 2.141124(9) Hz are detected. The pulse profile shows an indication of a secondary peak, which was not seen at higher flux. The 4$\sigma$ upper limit for the strength of a CRSF in the 3-20 keV band is 0.07 keV, lower than the strength of the line found at higher luminosity. The detection of pulsations shows that the source did not enter the "propeller" regime, even though the source flux of $4.15\times 10^{-10}$ erg/cm$^{2}$/s was almost one order of magnitude below the threshold for the propeller regime claimed in previous studies on this source. The transition into the propeller regime in GRO J1744-28 must therefore be below a luminosity of $3.2\times 10^{36}$ erg/s, which implies a surface magnetic field $\lesssim 2.9\times 10^{11}$ G and mass accretion rate $\lesssim 1.7\times 10^{16}$ g/s. A change of the CRSF depth as function of luminosity is not unexpected and has been observed in other sources. This result possibly implies a change in emission geometry as function of mass accretion rate to reduce the depth of the line below our detection limit.