TL;DR
This study identifies and analyzes the key COVID-19 information sources on Twitter in the U.S., revealing disparities in influence among different demographic groups and discussing implications for public health communication.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive census of COVID-19 elites on Twitter in the U.S. and examines demographic and political disparities in their online amplification.
Findings
Journalists and media outlets are consistently amplified.
Epidemiologists and health officials are underrepresented among elites.
Significant racial, geographic, and political disparities exist among COVID-19 elites.
Abstract
The ongoing, fluid nature of the COVID-19 pandemic requires individuals to regularly seek information about best health practices, local community spreading, and public health guidelines. In the absence of a unified response to the pandemic in the United States and clear, consistent directives from federal and local officials, people have used social media to collectively crowdsource COVID-19 elites, a small set of trusted COVID-19 information sources. We take a census of COVID-19 crowdsourced elites in the United States who have received sustained attention on Twitter during the pandemic. Using a mixed methods approach with a panel of Twitter users linked to public U.S. voter registration records, we find that journalists, media outlets, and political accounts have been consistently amplified around COVID-19, while epidemiologists, public health officials, and medical professionals…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
