Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable Recourses

TL;DR

This paper introduces AReS, a model-agnostic framework that creates interpretable, global summaries of actionable recourses for populations, aiding in model interpretation and bias detection.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel objective and framework for generating compact, interpretable rule-based summaries of recourses, with theoretical guarantees and practical evaluation.

Findings

Provides accurate, interpretable recourse summaries for entire populations

Detects model biases and discrimination through global explanations

Outperforms prior methods in interpretability and correctness

Abstract

As predictive models are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes decision-making, there has been a lot of interest in developing algorithms which can provide recourses to affected individuals. While developing such tools is important, it is even more critical to analyse and interpret a predictive model, and vet it thoroughly to ensure that the recourses it offers are meaningful and non-discriminatory before it is deployed in the real world. To this end, we propose a novel model agnostic framework called Actionable Recourse Summaries (AReS) to construct global counterfactual explanations which provide an interpretable and accurate summary of recourses for the entire population. We formulate a novel objective which simultaneously optimizes for correctness of the recourses and interpretability of the explanations, while minimizing overall recourse costs across the entire population. More specifically, our objective enables us to learn, with optimality guarantees on recourse correctness, a small number of compact rule sets each of which capture recourses for well defined subpopulations within the data. We also demonstrate theoretically that several of the prior approaches proposed to generate recourses for individuals are special cases of our framework. Experimental evaluation with real world datasets and user studies demonstrate that our framework can provide decision makers with a comprehensive overview of recourses corresponding to any black box model, and consequently help detect undesirable model biases and discrimination.