Maxwell Equations without a Polarization Field using a paradigm from biophysics

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new paradigm for electrodynamics that omits the classical polarization field, instead using an operational definition from biophysics to describe charge dynamics and improve model uniqueness.

Contribution

It proposes a novel operational approach to polarization, avoiding the non-uniqueness issues of traditional polarization fields in Maxwell's equations.

Findings

Operational polarization aligns well with experimental data.

Models based on this paradigm can describe charge dynamics without a polarization field.

The approach enhances model uniqueness and physical interpretability.

Abstract

Electrodynamics is usually written with a polarization vector field to describe the response of matter to electric fields, or more specifically, to describe changes in distribution of charge as an electric field is changed. This approach does not allow unique specification of a polarization field from measurements of electric and magnetic fields. Many polarization fields produce the same electric and magnetic fields, because only the divergence of the polarization enters Maxwell's first equation, relating charge and electric field. The curl of any function can be added to a polarization field without changing the electric field at all. The divergence of the curl is always zero. Models of structures that produce polarization cannot be uniquely determined from electrical measurements for the same reason. Models must describe charge distribution not just distribution of polarization to be unique. I propose a different paradigm to describe field dependent charge, i.e., to describe the phenomena of polarization. I propose an operational definition of polarization that has worked well in biophysics where a field dependent, time dependent polarization provides the gating current that makes neuronal sodium and potassium channels respond to voltage. The operational definition has been applied successfully to experiments for nearly fifty years. Estimates of polarization have been computed from simulations, models, and theories using this definition and they fit experimental data quite well. I propose that the same operational definition be used to define polarization charge in experiments, models, computations, theories, and simulations of other systems. Charge movement needs to be computed from a combination of electrodynamics and mechanics because 'everything interacts with everything else'. The classical polarization field need not enter into that treatment at all.