Finite Representability of Semigroups with Demonic Refinement

TL;DR

This paper investigates the finite representability of semigroups with demonic refinement, proving non-finite axiomatizability of their structures and establishing conditions for finite representations.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the class of structures ordered by demonic refinement and composition cannot be finitely axiomatized, and provides an infinite recursive axiomatisation.

Findings

The class of structures is non-finitely axiomatisable.

Finite representable structures have finite representations.

An infinite recursive axiomatisation for the class is provided.

Abstract

Composition and demonic refinement $\sqsubseteq$ of binary relations are defined by \begin{align*} (x, y)\in (R;S)&\iff \exists z((x, z)\in R\wedge (z, y)\in S) R\sqsubseteq S&\iff (dom(S)\subseteq dom(R) \wedge R\restriction_{dom(S)}\subseteq S) \end{align*} where $dom(S)=\{x:\exists y (x, y)\in S\}$ and $R\restriction_{dom(S)}$ denotes the restriction of $R$ to pairs $(x, y)$ where $x\in dom(S)$. Demonic calculus was introduced to model the total correctness of non-deterministic programs and has been applied to program verification. We prove that the class $R(\sqsubseteq, ;)$ of abstract $(\leq, \circ)$ structures isomorphic to a set of binary relations ordered by demonic refinement with composition cannot be axiomatised by any finite set of first-order $(\leq, \circ)$ formulas. We provide a fairly simple, infinite, recursive axiomatisation that defines $R(\sqsubseteq, ;)$. We prove that a finite representable $(\leq, \circ)$ structure has a representation over a finite base. This appears to be the first example of a signature for binary relations with composition where the representation class is non-finitely axiomatisable, but where the finite representations for finite representable structures property holds.