Reproducibility and Replication of Experimental Particle Physics Results
Thomas R. Junk, Louis Lyons

TL;DR
This paper discusses the practices, tools, and challenges of ensuring reproducibility and replication in experimental particle physics, highlighting its reliability measures and relevance to other scientific fields.
Contribution
It provides an overview of the methodologies and data sharing practices that support reproducibility in particle physics, emphasizing their potential applicability elsewhere.
Findings
Particle physics experiments have robust safeguards for result reliability.
Publicly available data sets and analysis tools facilitate reproduction.
Some results have failed replication, while others have been successfully replicated.
Abstract
Recently, much attention has been focused on the replicability of scientific results, causing scientists, statisticians, and journal editors to examine closely their methodologies and publishing criteria. Experimental particle physicists have been aware of the precursors of non-replicable research for many decades and have many safeguards to ensure that the published results are as reliable as possible. The experiments require large investments of time and effort to design, construct, and operate. Large collaborations produce and check the results, and many papers are signed by more than three thousand authors. This paper gives an introduction to what experimental particle physics is and to some of the tools that are used to analyze the data. It describes the procedures used to ensure that results can be computationally reproduced, both by collaborators and by non-collaborators. It…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
