A Design Space of Vision Science Methods for Visualization Research
Madison Elliott, Christine Nothelfer, Cindy Xiong, Danielle Szafir

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive design space of vision science methods tailored for visualization research, aiming to enhance understanding of perceptual processes and improve visualization design through empirical studies.
Contribution
It provides a curated collection of vision science experimental methods, a shared lexicon, and discusses their advantages and limitations for visualization research.
Findings
A shared lexicon for visualization and vision science research.
Discussion of experimental paradigms, response types, and measures.
Advocacy for deeper collaboration between visualization and vision science.
Abstract
A growing number of efforts aim to understand what people see when using a visualization. These efforts provide scientific grounding to complement design intuitions, leading to more effective visualization practice. However, published visualization research currently reflects a limited set of available methods for understanding how people process visualized data. Alternative methods from vision science offer a rich suite of tools for understanding visualizations, but no curated collection of these methods exists in either perception or visualization research. We introduce a design space of experimental methods for empirically investigating the perceptual processes involved with viewing data visualizations to ultimately inform visualization design guidelines. This paper provides a shared lexicon for facilitating experimental visualization research. We discuss popular experimental…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
