Canonical fragments of the strong reflection principle
Gunter Fuchs

TL;DR
This paper isolates and analyzes fragments of Todorcevic's strong reflection principle related to various forcing classes, revealing their implications and limitations in set theory.
Contribution
It introduces a method to extract and study specific fragments of SRP corresponding to forcing classes, connecting them to forcing axioms and exploring their effects.
Findings
Forcing axioms imply the corresponding SRP fragments.
The stationary set preserving fragment of SRP equals SRP itself.
Subcomplete fragment of SRP captures major consequences of subcomplete forcing axiom.
Abstract
For an arbitrary forcing class , the -fragment of Todorcevic's strong reflection principle SRP is isolated in such a way that (1) the forcing axiom for implies the -fragment of SRP, (2) the stationary set preserving fragment of SRP is the full principle SRP, and (3) the subcomplete fragment of SRP implies the major consequences of the subcomplete forcing axiom. Along the way, some hitherto unknown effects of (the subcomplete fragment of) SRP on mutual stationarity are explored, and some limitations to the extent to which fragments of SRP may capture the effects of their corresponding forcing axioms are established.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
