Comparisons of Different Fitting Methods for the Physical Parameters of A Star Cluster Sample of M33 with Spectroscopy and Photometry
Zhou Fan, Bingqiu Chen, Xiaoying Pang, Juanjuan Ren, Song Wang, Jing, Wang, Kefeng Tan, Nan Song, Chun Li, Jie Zheng, Gang Zhao

TL;DR
This study compares various spectral and photometric fitting methods to determine physical parameters of 17 star clusters in M33, highlighting the importance of blue-band photometry for accurate results and identifying UV-excess in some clusters.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of different fitting techniques and photometric data combinations in deriving star cluster parameters, emphasizing the value of blue-band photometry.
Findings
Photometry improves fitting accuracy, especially in blue bands.
Adding UV photometry reveals UV-excess in some clusters.
Results are consistent with previous studies.
Abstract
Star clusters are good tracers for formation and evolution of galaxies. We compared different fitting methods by using spectra (or by combining photometry) to determine the physical parameters. We choose a sample of 17 star clusters in M33, which previously lacked spectroscopic observations. The low-resolution spectra were taken with the Xinglong 2.16-m reflector of NAOC. The photometry used in the fitting includes and bands from the SAGE survey, as well as the published and photometry. We firstly derived ages and metallicities with the {\sc ULySS} (Vazdekis et al. and {\sc pegase-hr}) SSP model and the Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) (BC03) stellar population synthesis models for the full-spectrum fitting. The fitting results of both the BC03 and {\sc ULySS} models seem consistent with those of previous works as well. Then we add the SAGE $\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
