Parity and time-reversal elucidate both decision-making in empirical models and attractor scaling in critical Boolean networks
Jordan C. Rozum, Jorge G\'omez Tejeda Za\~nudo, Xiao Gan, D\'avid, Deritei, and R\'eka Albert

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach using parity and time-reversal to analyze complex behaviors in stochastic models, enabling efficient attractor detection in large Boolean networks and revealing insights into their scaling properties.
Contribution
It presents a new attractor identification algorithm based on parity and time-reversal, significantly improving scalability and uncovering the attractor scaling law in critical Boolean networks.
Findings
Attractor count scales with a low exponent of approximately 0.12.
The new algorithm is 80 times faster, handling networks with over 16,000 nodes.
The scaling law differs from previous analytical bounds, indicating a more constrained repertoire of behaviors.
Abstract
We present new applications of parity inversion and time-reversal to the emergence of complex behavior from simple dynamical rules in stochastic discrete models. Our parity-based encoding of causal relationships and time-reversal construction efficiently reveal discrete analogs of stable and unstable manifolds. We demonstrate their predictive power by studying decision-making in systems biology and statistical physics models. These applications underpin a novel attractor identification algorithm implemented for Boolean networks under stochastic dynamics. Its speed enables resolving a longstanding open question of how attractor count in critical random Boolean networks scales with network size, and whether the scaling matches biological observations. Via 80-fold improvement in probed network size (), we find the surprisingly low scaling exponent of --…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
