Point counting and Wilkie's conjecture for non-archimedean Pfaffian and Noetherian functions
Gal Binyamini, Raf Cluckers, Dmitry Novikov

TL;DR
This paper investigates polynomial curve counting over the non-archimedean field ${f C}( ext{ } t ext{ } )$, showing finiteness in some cases but polynomial growth for Pfaffian or Noetherian functions, thus extending Wilkie's conjecture.
Contribution
It establishes polynomial growth bounds for polynomial curves on Pfaffian and Noetherian definable sets over ${f C}( ext{ } t ext{ } )$, confirming Wilkie's conjecture in this context.
Findings
Finiteness of polynomial curves on transcendental parts of subanalytic sets over ${f C}( ext{ } t ext{ } )$.
Counterexamples showing unbounded growth for general analytic sets.
Polynomial growth bounds for Pfaffian and Noetherian functions.
Abstract
We consider the problem of counting polynomial curves on analytic or definable subsets over the field , as a function of the degree . A result of this type could be expected by analogy with the classical Pila-Wilkie counting theorem in the archimean situation. Some non-archimedean analogs of this type have been developed in the work of Cluckers-Comte-Loeser for the field , but the situation in appears to be significantly different. We prove that the set of polynomial curves of a fixed degree on the transcendental part of a subanalytic set over is automatically finite, but give examples showing that their number may grow arbitrarily quickly even for analytic sets. Thus no analog of the Pila-Wilkie theorem can be expected to hold for general analytic sets. On the other hand we show that if one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
