Do All Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Have A Magnetic Flux Rope Structure Near 1 AU?
Hongqiang Song, Jie Zhang, Xin Cheng, Gang Li, Qiang Hu, Leping Li,, Shujun Chen, Ruisheng Zheng, Yao Chen

TL;DR
This study investigates whether all interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) possess a magnetic flux rope structure near 1 AU, using geometric analysis to evaluate the effects of observational perspective and interactions.
Contribution
The paper provides evidence supporting that all ICMEs have a magnetic flux rope structure near 1 AU, emphasizing the role of geometric effects in observing non-magnetic cloud ICMEs.
Findings
Narrow sheath regions in MCs support geometric selection effects.
NMC sizes are consistent across solar cycles 23 and 24.
NMCs are smaller than MCs in cycle 23 but larger in cycle 24.
Abstract
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) often consist of a shock wave, sheath region, and ejecta region. The ejecta regions are divided into two broad classes: magnetic clouds (MC) that exhibit the characteristics of magnetic flux ropes and non-magnetic clouds (NMC) that do not. As CMEs result from eruption of magnetic flux ropes, it is important to answer why NMCs do not have the flux rope features. One claims that NMCs lose their original flux rope features due to the interactions between ICMEs or ICMEs and other large scale structures during their transit in the heliosphere. The other attributes this phenomenon to the geometric selection effect, i.e., when an ICME has its nose (flank, including leg and non-leg flanks) pass through the observing spacecraft, the MC (NMC) features will be detected along the spacecraft trajectory within the ejecta. In this Letter, we examine which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
