"Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat
Antonis Papasavva, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas, Zannettou, Emiliano De Cristofaro

TL;DR
This paper conducts an empirical exploratory analysis of the QAnon community on Voat, examining user activity, discourse topics, narratives, and toxicity levels to understand its structure and content.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed characterization of the QAnon community on Voat, analyzing discourse, narratives, and toxicity, highlighting its relation to other conspiracy theories.
Findings
QAnon discussions focus on US politics, Trump, and world events.
QAnon-related narratives are linked to Pizzagate and 'Q' drops.
Discussions are less toxic than the broader Voat community.
Abstract
Online fringe communities offer fertile grounds for users seeking and sharing ideas fueling suspicion of mainstream news and conspiracy theories. Among these, the QAnon conspiracy theory emerged in 2017 on 4chan, broadly supporting the idea that powerful politicians, aristocrats, and celebrities are closely engaged in a global pedophile ring. Simultaneously, governments are thought to be controlled by "puppet masters," as democratically elected officials serve as a fake showroom of democracy. This paper provides an empirical exploratory analysis of the QAnon community on Voat.co, a Reddit-esque news aggregator, which has captured the interest of the press for its toxicity and for providing a platform to QAnon followers. More precisely, we analyze a large dataset from /v/GreatAwakening, the most popular QAnon-related subverse (the Voat equivalent of a subreddit), to characterize…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
