A Framework for Fairer Machine Learning in Organizations
Lily Morse, Mike H.M. Teodorescu, Yazeed Awwad, Gerald Kane

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for organizations to select and implement fair machine learning algorithms, addressing sources of unfairness, fairness tradeoffs, and behavioral ethics to prevent bias over time.
Contribution
It provides the first integrated framework combining ethics, fairness criteria, and organizational considerations for fair machine learning implementation.
Findings
Identifies sources of unfairness in organizational machine learning
Reviews fairness criteria and their tradeoffs
Proposes a practical framework for fair algorithm deployment
Abstract
With the increase in adoption of machine learning tools by organizations risks of unfairness abound, especially when human decision processes in outcomes of socio-economic importance such as hiring, housing, lending, and admissions are automated. We reveal sources of unfair machine learning, review fairness criteria, and provide a framework which, if implemented, would enable an organization to both avoid implementing an unfair machine learning model, but also to avoid the common situation that as an algorithm learns with more data it can become unfair over time. Issues of behavioral ethics in machine learning implementations by organizations have not been thoroughly addressed in the literature, because many of the necessary concepts are dispersed across three literatures: ethics, machine learning, and management. Further, tradeoffs between fairness criteria in machine learning have not…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
