Elastic positivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatterings
Kimiko Yamashita, Cen Zhang, Shuang-Yong Zhou

TL;DR
This paper compares elastic and extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT, demonstrating that the extremal approach is more constraining, efficient, and applicable for complex scenarios, providing the tightest bounds on gauge-boson couplings.
Contribution
It introduces and compares the extremal positivity approach with the traditional elastic method for deriving bounds in SMEFT, highlighting its advantages in complexity and computational efficiency.
Findings
Extremal approach yields more constraining bounds.
Extremal approach is faster and more applicable to complex cases.
Bounds exclude approximately 99.3% of current LHC parameter space.
Abstract
The positivity bounds, derived from the axiomatic principles of quantum field theory (QFT), constrain the signs of Wilson coefficients and their linear combinations in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). The precise determination of these bounds, however, can become increasingly difficult as more and more SM modes and operators are taken into account. We study two approaches that aim at obtaining the full set of bounds for a given set of SM fields: 1) the traditional elastic positivity approach, which exploits the elastic scattering amplitudes of states with arbitrarily superposed helicities as well as other quantum numbers, and 2) the newly proposed extremal positivity approach, which constructs the allowed coefficient space directly by using the extremal representation of convex cones. Considering the electroweak gauge-bosons as an example, we demonstrate how the best…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
