High-resolution three-dimensional crystalline microscopy
Marc Allain, Virginie Chamard, Stephan O. Hruszkewycz

TL;DR
This paper explores how 3D crystalline structures are encoded in Bragg 3DXCDI measurements, emphasizing the importance of experimental parameters in optimizing reconstruction quality and resolution.
Contribution
It provides a method to evaluate and set experimental parameters beforehand to improve 3D reconstruction resolution in ptychographic 3DXCDI.
Findings
Experimental parameters influence reconstruction quality
Resolution limits can be predicted before experiments
Guidelines for parameter optimization are proposed
Abstract
In this communication, we discuss how 3D information about the structure of a crystalline sample is encoded in Bragg 3DXCDI measurements. Our analysis brings to light the role of the experimental parameters in the quality of the final reconstruction. One of our salient conclusions is that these parameters can be set prior to the ptychographic 3DXCDI experiment and that the spatial resolution limit of the 3D reconstruction can be evaluated accordingly.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Digital Holography and Microscopy · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
