On the K\'arm\'an momentum-integral approach and the Pohlhausen paradox
Joseph Majdalani, Li-Jun Xuan

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the Kármán momentum-integral approach, explains the Pohlhausen paradox, and develops improved velocity profiles that enhance the accuracy of boundary-layer predictions and extend solutions beyond classical limits.
Contribution
It identifies the reasons behind the Pohlhausen polynomial paradox and proposes optimal piecewise velocity profiles to improve boundary-layer analysis accuracy.
Findings
Improved velocity profiles reduce prediction errors by an order of magnitude.
A rational explanation for the Pohlhausen paradox is provided.
New solutions extend boundary-layer models beyond classical limits.
Abstract
This work explores simple relations that follow from the momentum-integral equation absent a pressure gradient. The resulting expressions enable us to relate the boundary-layer characteristics of a velocity profile, , to an assumed flow function and its wall derivative relative to the wall-normal coordinate, . Consequently, disturbance, displacement, and momentum thicknesses, as well as skin friction and drag coefficients, which are typically evaluated and tabulated in classical monographs, can be readily determined for a given profile, . Here denotes the boundary-layer coordinate. These expressions are then employed to provide a rational explanation for the 1921 Pohlhausen polynomial paradox, namely, the reason why a quartic representation of the velocity leads to less accurate predictions of the disturbance, displacement, and momentum thicknesses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
