A short proof that ${\mathcal B}(L_1)$ is not amenable
Yemon Choi

TL;DR
This paper presents a concise proof demonstrating that the algebra of bounded operators on L_1 is not amenable, simplifying previous complex arguments and establishing non-amenability through classical properties of representable operators.
Contribution
It offers a new, streamlined proof of non-amenability of B(L_1), avoiding indirect methods used in prior approaches.
Findings
B(L_1) is not amenable.
B(L_1) is not approximately amenable.
The proof bypasses complex machinery of previous proofs.
Abstract
Non-amenability of has been surprisingly difficult to prove for the classical Banach spaces, but is now known for and for all . However, the arguments are rather indirect: the proof for goes via non-amenability of and a transference principle developed by Daws and Runde (Studia Math., 2010). In this note, we provide a short proof that and some of its subalgebras are non-amenable, which completely bypasses all of this machinery. Our approach is based on classical properties of the ideal of representable operators on , and shows that is not even approximately amenable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
