The MOSDEF Survey: An Improved Voronoi Binning Technique on Spatially Resolved Stellar Populations at z~2

TL;DR

This paper introduces an improved Voronoi binning method that incorporates multiple filters to better resolve stellar populations in high-redshift galaxies, leading to more accurate SED-derived parameters.

Contribution

The authors develop a multi-filter Voronoi binning technique that enhances the reliability of spatially resolved stellar population analysis at z~2.

Findings

Multi-filter binning yields more consistent stellar population parameters.

Single-filter binning can bias E(B-V) estimates by up to 0.20 mag.

The new method improves constraints on resolved SEDs across wavelengths.

Abstract

We use a sample of 350 star-forming galaxies at $1.25<z<2.66$ from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field survey to demonstrate an improved Voronoi binning technique that we use to study the properties of resolved stellar populations in $z\sim2$ galaxies. Stellar population and dust maps are constructed from the high-resolution CANDELS/3D-HST multi-band imaging. Rather than constructing the layout of resolved elements (i.e., Voronoi bins) from the S/N distribution of the $H_{160}$-band alone, we introduce a modified Voronoi binning method that additionally incorporates the S/N distribution of several resolved filters. The SED-derived resolved E(B-V)$_{\text{stars}}$, stellar population ages, SFRs, and stellar masses that are inferred from the Voronoi bins constructed from multiple filters are generally consistent with the properties inferred from the integrated photometry within the uncertainties, with the exception of the inferred E(B-V)$_{\text{stars}}$ from our $z\sim1.5$ sample due to their UV slopes being unconstrained by the resolved photometry. The results from our multi-filter Voronoi binning technique are compared to those derived from a "traditional" single-filter Voronoi binning approach. We find that single-filter binning produces inferred E(B-V)$_{\text{stars}}$ that are systematically redder by 0.02 mag on average, but could differ by up to 0.20 mag, and could be attributed to poorly constrained resolved photometry covering the UV slope. Overall, we advocate that our methodology produces more reliable SED-derived parameters due to the best-fit resolved SEDs being better constrained at all resolved wavelengths--particularly those covering the UV slope.