Environmental contours and optimal design
Kristina Rognlien Dahl, Arne Bang Huseby

TL;DR
This paper explores how classical and buffered environmental contours relate to risk measures like value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk, and how these connections can optimize structural design to minimize failure risk.
Contribution
It establishes theoretical links between environmental contours and risk measures, providing new representations for optimal design problems using these contours.
Findings
Classical contours relate to value-at-risk in design optimization.
Buffered contours connect to conditional value-at-risk for risk-sensitive design.
Derived conditions for optimal structural design based on environmental contours.
Abstract
Classical environmental contours are used in structural design in order to obtain upper bounds on the failure probabilities of a large class of designs. Buffered environmental contours serve the same purpose, but with respect to the so-called buffered failure probability. In contrast to classical environmental contours, buffered environmental contours do not just take into account failure vs. functioning, but also to which extent the system is failing. This is important to take into account whenever the consequences of failure are relevant. For instance, if we consider a power network, it is important to know not just that the power supply is failed, but how many consumers are affected by the failure. In this paper, we study the connections between environmental contours, both classical and buffered, and optimal structural design. We connect the classical environmental contours to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
