The Submillimeter Active Region Excess Brightness Temperature during Solar Cycles 23 and 24
C. Guillermo Gim\'enez de Castro (1, 2), Andr\'e L. G. Pereira, (1), J. Fernando Valle Silva (1), Caius L. Selhorst (3), Cristina H., Mandrini (2), Germ\'an D. Cristiani (2), Jean-Pierre Raulin (1) and, Adriana Valio (1) ((1) Centro de R\'adio Astronomia e Astrof\'isica

TL;DR
This study examines the variation of excess brightness temperature in solar active regions at submillimeter wavelengths during solar cycles 23 and 24, revealing strong correlations with sunspot numbers and insights into chromospheric thermal emissions.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of the temporal evolution of submillimeter excess brightness temperature in active regions across two solar cycles, highlighting its correlation with magnetic activity.
Findings
Strong correlation between excess brightness temperature and sunspot number.
Spectral index remains nearly constant, indicating optically thick thermal emission.
Correlation coefficients increase when focusing solely on Cycle 24.
Abstract
We report the temporal evolution of the excess brightness temperature above solar active regions (ARs) observed with the Solar Submillimeter Telescope (SST) at 212 ({\lambda} = 1.4 mm) and 405 GHz ({\lambda} = 0.7 mm) during Cycles 23 and 24. Comparison with the sunspot number (SSN) yields a Pearson's correlation coefficient R = 0.88 and 0.74 for 212 and 405 GHz, respectively. Moreover, when only Cycle 24 is taken into account the correlation coefficients go to 0.93 and 0.81 for each frequency. We derive the spectral index {\alpha} between SST frequencies and found a slight anti-correlation with the SSN (R = -0.25); however, since the amplitude of the variation is lower than the standard deviation we cannot draw a definite conclusion. Indeed, {\alpha} remains almost constant within the uncertainties with a median value approximate to 0 characteristic of an optically thick thermal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
