Khovanov homology and cobordisms between split links
Onkar Singh Gujral, Adam Simon Levine

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Khovanov homology behaves under certain cobordisms between split links, showing it cannot detect linking between components and establishing new results on ribbon concordance.
Contribution
It proves that Khovanov homology maps for split links depend only on individual components, not linking, and demonstrates that strongly homotopy-ribbon concordances induce injections on Khovanov homology.
Findings
Khovanov maps for split links are determined by component maps
Strongly homotopy-ribbon concordances induce injections on Khovanov homology
Non-split links cannot be ribbon concordant to split links
Abstract
In this paper, we study the (in)sensitivity of the Khovanov functor to four-dimensional linking of surfaces. We prove that if and are split links, and is a cobordism between and that is the union of disjoint (but possibly linked) cobordisms between the components of and the components of , then the map on Khovanov homology induced by is completely determined by the maps induced by the individual components of and does not detect the linking between the components. As a corollary, we prove that a strongly homotopy-ribbon concordance (i.e., a concordance whose complement can be built with only 1- and 2-handles) induces an injection on Khovanov homology, which generalizes a result of the second author and Zemke. Additionally, we show that a non-split link cannot be ribbon concordant to a split link.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
