TL;DR
This study demonstrates that deep learning models can reliably detect microsleep episodes from raw EEG and EOG data, approaching expert-level accuracy, which could improve clinical vigilance assessments.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel deep learning approach for automatic detection of microsleep episodes using raw EEG and EOG data, addressing limitations of traditional scoring methods.
Findings
Deep learning models achieved performance close to human experts.
Detection was highly accurate for wakefulness and microsleep episodes.
Borderline segments like MSEc and ED had lower detection accuracy, similar to expert inter-rater reliability.
Abstract
Brief fragments of sleep shorter than 15 s are defined as microsleep episodes (MSEs), often subjectively perceived as sleepiness. Their main characteristic is a slowing in frequency in the electroencephalogram (EEG), similar to stage N1 sleep according to standard criteria. The maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) is often used in a clinical setting to assess vigilance. Scoring of the MWT in most sleep-wake centers is limited to classical definition of sleep (30-s epochs), and MSEs are mostly not considered in the absence of established scoring criteria defining MSEs but also because of the laborious work. We aimed for automatic detection of MSEs with machine learning, i.e. with deep learning based on raw EEG and EOG data as input. We analyzed MWT data of 76 patients. Experts visually scored wakefulness, and according to recently developed scoring criteria MSEs, microsleep episode…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSigmoid Activation · Tanh Activation · Long Short-Term Memory
