On prefix palindromic length of automatic words
Anna E. Frid, Enzo Laborde, Jarkko Peltom\"aki

TL;DR
This paper investigates the prefix palindromic length of automatic words, proving regularity for certain classes and providing formulas for specific cases, while suggesting that some automatic words may have non-regular prefix palindromic length functions.
Contribution
It proves that the prefix palindromic length function is $k$-regular for $k$-automatic words with finitely many palindromes and derives explicit formulas for the paperfolding and Rudin-Shapiro words.
Findings
The function is $k$-regular for certain automatic words.
Explicit formulas are derived for the paperfolding and Rudin-Shapiro words.
Evidence suggests some automatic words have non-regular prefix palindromic length functions.
Abstract
The prefix palindromic length of an infinite word is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length of . Since 2013, it is still unknown if is unbounded for every aperiodic infinite word , even though this has been proven for almost all aperiodic words. At the same time, the only well-known nontrivial infinite word for which the function has been precisely computed is the Thue-Morse word . This word is -automatic and, predictably, its function is -regular, but is this the case for all automatic words? In this paper, we prove that this function is -regular for every -automatic word containing only a finite number of palindromes. For two such words, namely the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
