Origin of the Large Negative Electrocaloric Effect in Antiferroelectric PbZrO3
Pablo Vales-Castro, Romain Faye, Miquel Vellvehi, Youri Nouchokgwe,, Xavier Perpin\`a, J.M. Caicedo, Xavier Jord\`a, Krystian Roleder, Dariusz, Kajewski, Amador Perez-Tomas, Emmanuel Defay, Gustau Catalan

TL;DR
This study investigates the electrocaloric effect in PbZrO3, revealing large negative and positive effects near phase transition, driven by antiferroelectric-ferroelectric switching rather than dipole destabilization.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the large negative electrocaloric effect in PbZrO3 originates from phase switching, providing new insight into electrocaloric mechanisms in antiferroelectrics.
Findings
Large electrocaloric effects of -3.5 K to +5.5 K measured.
Negative effect caused by antiferroelectric-ferroelectric switching.
Contrasts with previous dipole destabilization explanation.
Abstract
We have studied the electrocaloric response of the archetypal antiferroelectric PbZrO3 as a function of voltage and temperature in the vicinity of its antiferroelectric-paraelectric phase transition. Large electrocaloric effects of opposite signs, ranging from an electro-cooling of -3.5 K to an electro-heating of +5.5 K, were directly measured with an infrared camera. We show by calorimetric and electromechanical measurements that the large negative electrocaloric effect comes from an endothermic antiferroelectric-ferroelectric switching, in contrast to dipole destabilization of the antiparallel lattice, previously proposed as an explanation for the negative electrocaloric effect of antiferroelectrics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
