Interdependent transport via percolation backbones in spatial networks
Bnaya Gross, Ivan Bonamassa, Shlomo Havlin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how interdependence affects transport in spatial networks, revealing increased vulnerability and phase transition behaviors when considering the network's backbone rather than just the giant component.
Contribution
It introduces a model of interdependent resistor networks with spatial constraints, analyzing their vulnerability and phase transitions compared to traditional percolation models.
Findings
Interdependent resistor networks are more vulnerable than percolation-based networks.
First-order phase transitions occur at link-lengths where the mutual giant component still forms.
Dandling ends play a crucial role in the increased vulnerability.
Abstract
The functionality of nodes in a network is often described by the structural feature of belonging to the giant component. However, when dealing with problems like transport, a more appropriate functionality criterion is for a node to belong to the network's backbone, where the flow of information and of other physical quantities (such as current) occurs. Here we study percolation in a model of interdependent resistor networks and show the effect of spatiality on their coupled functioning. We do this on a realistic model of spatial networks, featuring a Poisson distribution of link-lengths. We find that interdependent resistor networks are significantly more vulnerable than their percolation-based counterparts, featuring first-order phase transitions at link-lengths where the mutual giant component still emerges continuously. We explain this apparent contradiction by tracing the origin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
