On the mechanism of $T_{4c}(6900)$ tetraquark production

TL;DR

This paper investigates the production mechanisms of the $T_{4c}(6900)$ tetraquark, comparing single and double parton scattering, and suggests the $0^+$ spin scenario is more consistent with LHCb data.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of SPS and DPS production mechanisms for the $T_{4c}(6900)$ tetraquark using $k_t$-factorization and compares spin scenarios against experimental data.

Findings

DPS contribution is nearly 100 times larger than SPS.

The $0^+$ spin assignment better matches LHCb data.

SPS mechanism with $0^+$ is favored over $0^-$ based on transverse momentum distributions.

Abstract

We discuss the production mechanism of a new state, a putative fully charm tetraquark, observed recently by the LHCb at M = 6.9 GeV in the $J/\psi J/\psi$ channel. Both single parton scattering (SPS) and double parton scattering (DPS) mechanisms are considered. We calculate the distribution in the invariant mass of the four-quark system $M_{4c}$ for SPS and DPS production of $c c \bar c \bar c$ in the $k_t$-factorization approach with modern unintegrated gluon distribution functions (UGDFs). The so-calculated contribution of DPS is almost two orders of magnitude larger than the SPS one, but the tetraquark formation mechanism is unknown at present. Imposing a mass window around the resonance position we calculate the corresponding distribution in $p_{t,4c}$ -- the potential tetraquark transverse momentum. The cross section for the $J/\psi J/\psi$ continuum is calculated in addition, again including SPS (box diagrams) and DPS contributions which are of similar size. The formation probability is estimated trying to reproduce the LHCb signal-to-background ratio. The calculation of the SPS $g g \to T_{4c}(6900)$ fusion mechanism is performed in the $k_T$-factorization approach assuming different spin scenarios ($0^+$ and $0^-$). The $0^+$ assignment is preferred over the $0^-$ one by the comparison of the transverse momentum distribution of signal and background with the LHCb preliminary data assuming the SPS mechanism dominance. There is no reliable approach for the DPS formation mechanism of tetraquarks at present as this is a complicated multi-body problem.