TL;DR
This study tests the criticality hypothesis in animal groups using a spatial model, finding that criticality enhances school structure but is not an evolutionarily stable state due to spatial self-sorting effects.
Contribution
It provides the first spatially-explicit model analysis showing criticality's effects on prey schools and challenges the idea that self-organization towards criticality is driven by evolution.
Findings
Schools at criticality have optimal spatial structure.
Criticality is not evolutionarily stable due to spatial self-sorting.
Spatial phenomena are crucial in understanding collective behavior.
Abstract
According to the criticality hypothesis, collective biological systems should operate in a special parameter region, close to so-called critical points, where the collective behavior undergoes a qualitative change between different dynamical regimes. Critical systems exhibit unique properties, which may benefit collective information processing such as maximal responsiveness to external stimuli. Besides neuronal and gene-regulatory networks, recent empirical data suggests that also animal collectives may be examples of self-organized critical systems. However, open questions about self-organization mechanisms in animal groups remain: Evolutionary adaptation towards a group-level optimum (group-level selection), implicitly assumed in the "criticality hypothesis", appears in general not reasonable for fission-fusion groups composed of non-related individuals. Furthermore, previous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
