Evaluation of Software Product Quality Metrics

TL;DR

This paper conducts a comprehensive longitudinal analysis of software quality metrics across three open-source applications over 18 years, addressing existing research gaps and enabling better comparative evaluation.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed methodology and tooling aligned with prior studies, facilitating large-scale data analysis and comparison across diverse software projects.

Findings

Identifies metric dependencies and their consistency across applications.

Provides a longitudinal view of metric evolution over 18 years.

Facilitates comparative evaluation with existing research.

Abstract

Computing devices and associated software govern everyday life, and form the backbone of safety critical systems in banking, healthcare, automotive and other fields. Increasing system complexity, quickly evolving technologies and paradigm shifts have kept software quality research at the forefront. Standards such as ISO's 25010 express it in terms of sub-characteristics such as maintainability, reliability and security. A significant body of literature attempts to link these subcharacteristics with software metric values, with the end goal of creating a metric-based model of software product quality. However, research also identifies the most important existing barriers. Among them we mention the diversity of software application types, development platforms and languages. Additionally, unified definitions to make software metrics truly language-agnostic do not exist, and would be difficult to implement given programming language levels of variety. This is compounded by the fact that many existing studies do not detail their methodology and tooling, which precludes researchers from creating surveys to enable data analysis on a larger scale. In our paper, we propose a comprehensive study of metric values in the context of three complex, open-source applications. We align our methodology and tooling with that of existing research, and present it in detail in order to facilitate comparative evaluation. We study metric values during the entire 18-year development history of our target applications, in order to capture the longitudinal view that we found lacking in existing literature. We identify metric dependencies and check their consistency across applications and their versions. At each step, we carry out comparative evaluation with existing research and present our results.