Non-LTE inversions of a confined X2.2 flare: I. Vector magnetic field in the photosphere and chromosphere

TL;DR

This study compares various inversion methods to accurately determine the vector magnetic field in the solar atmosphere during a confined X2.2 flare, revealing strong fields and structural details that inform models of solar eruptions.

Contribution

It demonstrates the effectiveness of non-LTE inversions in capturing detailed magnetic field structures in the photosphere and chromosphere during a solar flare, highlighting discrepancies with numerical models.

Findings

Non-LTE inversions yield higher and more structured magnetic fields.

Strong magnetic patches exceeding 4.5 kG in photosphere and 3 kG in chromosphere.

Inversions confirm flux rope footpoints predicted by models.

Abstract

Obtaining the magnetic field vector accurately in the solar atmosphere is essential for studying changes in field topology during flares and to reliably model space weather. We tackle this problem by applying various inversion methods to a confined X2.2 flare in NOAA AR 12673 on September 6, 2017, comparing the photospheric and chromospheric magnetic field vector with those from two numerical models of this event. We obtain the photospheric field from Milne-Eddington (ME) and (non-)local thermal equilibrium (non-LTE) inversions of Hinode SOT/SP Fe I 6301.5{\AA} and 6302.5{\AA}. The chromospheric field is obtained from a spatially-regularised weak field approximation (WFA) and non-LTE inversions of Ca II 8542{\AA} observed with CRISP at the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope. The LTE- and non-LTE-inferred photospheric field components are strongly correlated throughout the atmosphere, with stronger field and higher temperatures in the non-LTE inversions. For the chromospheric field, the non-LTE inversions correlate well with the spatially-regularised WFA. We find strong-field patches of over 4.5 kG in the photosphere, co-located with similar concentrations exceeding 3 kG in the chromosphere. The obtained field strengths are up to 2-3 times higher than in the numerical models, with more concentrated and structured photosphere-to-chromosphere shear close to the polarity inversion line. The LTE and non-LTE Fe I inversions yield essentially the same photospheric field, while ME inversions fail to reproduce the field vector orientation where Fe I is in emission. Our inversions confirm the locations of flux rope footpoints that are predicted by numerical models. However, pre-processing and lower spatial resolution lead to weaker and smoother field in the models than what the data indicate. This emphasises the need for higher spatial resolution in the models to better constrain pre-eruptive flux ropes.