Darboux diagonalization of the spatial 3-metric in Kerr spacetime
Joshua Baines (Victoria University of Wellington), Thomas Berry, (Victoria University of Wellington), Alex Simpson (Victoria University of, Wellington), and Matt Visser (Victoria University of Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the possibility of diagonalizing the spatial 3-metric in Kerr spacetime using Darboux's method, revealing fundamental incompatibilities with other desirable metric properties.
Contribution
It demonstrates a no-go theorem showing that Darboux diagonalization of Kerr's spatial slices cannot coexist with unit-lapse conditions and axial symmetry.
Findings
Darboux diagonalization is incompatible with unit-lapse form in Kerr spacetime.
The spatial 3-slices of Kerr cannot be made conformally flat while maintaining certain conditions.
A no-go theorem analogous to the conformal flatness restriction is established.
Abstract
The astrophysical importance of the Kerr spacetime cannot be overstated. Of the currently known exact solutions to the Einstein field equations, the Kerr spacetime stands out in terms of its direct applicability to describing astronomical black hole candidates. In counterpoint, purely mathematically, there is an old classical result of differential geometry, due to Darboux, that all 3-manifolds can have their metrics recast into diagonal form. In the case of the Kerr spacetime the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates provide an explicit example of a diagonal spatial 3-metric. Unfortunately, as we demonstrate herein, Darboux diagonalization of the spatial 3-slices of the Kerr spacetime is incompatible with simultaneously putting the Kerr metric into unit-lapse form while retaining manifest axial symmetry. This no-go theorem is somewhat reminiscent of the no-go theorem to the effect that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
